Two of Alaska’s lawmakers are not taking kindly to corporate influence on public elections. U.S. Sen. Mark Begich co-signed a constitutional amendment that rescinds years of legal precedent finding corporations have many of the same rights as a legal person.
Early this month, the Supreme Court held (in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v.
From Sacco and Vanzetti to Troy Davis, witnesses to crime scenes get it wrong too often. So why did the Supreme Court just make it harder to challenge such evidence in court?
In a major decision on privacy in the digital age, the Supreme Court ruled Monday that police need a warrant before attaching a GPS device to a person's car. The ruling, which marked the justices' first-ever review of GPS tracking, was unanimous.
" The Supreme Court says police must get a search warrant before using GPS technology to track criminal suspects."
SCOTUS decides GPS monitoring is a search, SDFLA Blog - Per Justice Scalia: "The Government’s attachment of the GPS device to the vehicle, and its use of that device to monitor the vehicle’s movements, constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment." Here's …
Protesters marked the second anniversary of the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling by unfurling a banner reading “U.S. Supreme Koch” on the court house steps.
"An Act providing that for-profit corporations and limited liability companiesorganized in this state are not persons for purposes of influencing the outcomes of public office elections, initiatives, referendums, or recalls."
We approach the 39th anniversary of Roe v.
U.S.
Supreme Court Watch has not initiated any private discussions.